OWLSTYLE

 

What the staff member needs to know about the student newspaper at Prince George's Community College

 

CONTENTS:

 

How the Owl covers PGCC

 

Who works for the OWL?

 

How OWL stories are written

 

Asking questions for accuracy

 

Writing clearly

 

Layout styles and purposes

 

OWLSTYLE: a style guide for THE PGCC OWL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW THE OWL COVERS PGCC      

          The OWL is the newspaper for Prince George's Community College, supported by student activity fee funds and the advertising revenue it receives. Members of the OWL staff write stories that cost about a dollar of that money for every 40-50 words they write that get into print. This is a conservative estimate. OWL staffers know, therefore, that they should measure those words out with care for maximum effect.

 

          Prince George's Community College does a lot, officially and unofficially, to communicate necessary information to the students, staff and faculty. The OWL does the best job. It comes out at regular intervals and is available all over the campus. It is a familiar sight to all seeking information. The OWL and the staff members that have worked for it over the years have created a large responsibility for the newspaper.

 

          It is important that all the facts that appear in the OWL be as close to correct as reporters and editors can make them. It is also important that those facts be the ones that people need. Perhaps most important of all, a newspaper shows the relationships between facts.

 

          It's important that the stories in the OWL be written clearly. OWL staffers know that it's necessary to include enough details about an event or idea so that the reader gets a full picture. But we know, too, that there is such a thing as too much detail. The happy medium keeps most of our readers happy most of the time. OWL staffers have excellent vocabularies. But they also have enough ego-strength to use the simple, clear word instead of the long, obscure one.

 

          News stories that appear in the OWL follow some general patterns that have been tested and proven in the news business. These patterns satisfy readers and keep them coming back.

 

          A story may be primarily "hard" news, with a highly informative lede paragraph that grabs the reader right away with the most important point of the story. Or it may be mainly "feature" style, starting out with a specific, concrete example illustrating the general idea of the story. Either way, it is tightly written and keeps the writer's opinion and personal perspective out of the way.

 

Examples: (from the totally made-up story we will see again below)

 

A hard-news lede paragraph

          The College plans to sue the original contractors for Bladen Hall because asbestos has been discovered in the ceilings of at least three classrooms in PGCC's oldest (1974) classroom building.

 

 

 

A feature lede paragraph

          Tonia McKinney didn't know, when that funny dust fell on her notebook during her English class in Bladen Hall, that she was seeing the beginning of a controversy that would get Prince George's Community College in court, suing a contractor for $35,000.

          The OWL makes lots of space for opinion and commentary, because the voice of the students (including its own writers) is critical to the success and development of a dynamic community college. OWL staffers who want to express their opinions do it there, not on the news pages. Often a news story will report facts, including the opinions of people involved in the story. Some of that material might also appear in an opinion piece in the OWL, either written by the reporter who also wrote the news story, or by someone else.

 

          News stories in the OWL-- as opposed to opinion pieces-- concentrate, instead, on the who, what when, where and why of the story. These "Five W's" have been the foundation of good news stories since 19th-century publishers found that the public needed (and would pay for) reliable facts. Every story that appears in the OWL was assigned by the editors because it is relevant to PGCC and the community it serves. And readers of the OWL deserve the best, most factual and accurate, and most complete story we can give them.

 

          It is important for OWL staffers to realize the role the newspaper plays on the PGCC campus. When it is accurate, relatively free of errors of fact or writing, and covers stories that are relevant and interesting to students, faculty and staff at PGCC, it is read and trusted. When it does not fulfill this responsibility, it is the subject of amusement or disdain. Individual reporters have a responsibility to work hard to avoid errors. Editors have the responsibility to ask reporters to verify questionable or potentially troublesome facts or statements, even if the reporter is tired and would like the story to be over and done with.

 

WHO WORKS FOR THE OWL?

 

          Producing a campus newspaper takes more than writers, even though the "text" of the OWL is what students, faculty and staff depend on for their information.

 

          PGCC students who have strong research interests may be researchers for the OWL, even if their names never appear as the writer of a story. As indicated below ("How OWL stories are developed") a story first appears as a series of questions to be answered. Researchers answer those questions-- sometimes by looking at printed sources, sometimes by conducting interviews with those who have expertise or are responsible for aspects of the story's topic.

 

          For instance, a story about a new or revised curriculum offering in a major might consist of questions that are answered (at least some of them) in a report written by a committee of faculty members in that major. The faculty may have consulted some students in the major and even included their comments in the report. If they didn't a researcher might seek out some students in that major for their comments on the proposals. The writer or researcher might also contact people who didn't have direct input into the report but now have the responsibility for okaying action on the report, such as the Dean of the division. That responsible person might have a different perspective on the proposals in the report. The OWL staffers-- researchers and writers-- put together a complete story from all those sources.

 

          The researcher might wind up writing the story, or might turn the information over to a writer. The material might wind up in a news story, or an opinion/commentary article, or (if it's a "hot" topic) both.

 

          It doesn't stop there. Showing what is going on, visually, is the job of artists and photographers. Photographers provide the "you are there" feeling that makes news seem like a report from the scene. And artists can provide a point of view visually-- in cartoons or in expressive versions of everyday things. All these things make the OWL a total portrait of PGCC that is more than words.

 

          There is also "art" involved in designing and laying out the pages of the OWL. Making sure that the parts of the package all work together is a high-level design skill.

 

          Researchers, writers, artists and designers all do their thing for the OWL under the eyes of the editors. Editors have these basic assignments:

 

          *To "budget" each issue of the OWL. The first "budget" is the list of story ideas that come up at the first staff meeting after the last issue goes to press-- usually Wednesday. Editors have story ideas and other staffers contribute theirs, and folks go away from the meeting (or should) knowing what part they have in covering the stories on that "budget." The budget gets refined as deadline draws closer. Some stories don't turn out (or turn out to have an entirely different "slant" than the staff first thought). Other, new stories pop up and join the ranks. The editors make some final educated guesses about the amount of space to set aside for the stories in the budget, and earmark the top ones for the front page. Then the paper goes to press. Any similarity between the first "budget" and the actual stories that get in the paper may be purely coincidental.

 

          *To organize the stories, and the paper, in a meaningful way. This means that the front page is almost always regular news stories, not commentary or opinion. The newspaper is packaged, with each page having its own label-- "Commentary" or "Sports" or "Arts & Entertainment"--and the paper's main franchise is news, which is front page material. Editors try to keep the readers interested without keeping them guessing about where to look for their "most wanted" information.

 

          *To make sure the stories are accurate, fair, complete and well-written, with a structure that invites the reader to dip into the information the OWL has to offer. Editors may ask writers or researchers to make "just a few more phone calls" to ensure that everything in the story is as accurate as possible, that all people and organizations dealt with in the story are treated fairly and that the story has all the facts it needs to satisfy readers' questions completely. The stories are never perfect, but the OWL staff, including the editors, tries to make them as good as they can be.

 

HOW OWL STORIES ARE DEVELOPED

 

          The idea for a story can come from anywhere. Many OWL staffers suggest stories to the editors. There are several simple tests that determine whether the story goes from idea to print:

 

#Does this relate specifically-- perhaps even exclusively-- to PGCC students, staff and faculty?

#Is there something new about the story? Does this new aspect affect PGCC people, especially in their pocketbooks or the quality and/or availability of their education here?

#Is the story interesting? Will readers agree that it was worth the effort? Does it pass the "so what" test?

 

          If a story passes these tests, the editor(s) and writer(s) together should sit down and ask: who is the best source of information for this story? And them, just as important, what questions should be asked to make sure we get all the information we need? This may be the hardest part of journalism. Once you have got the right questions, and ask the right people or look in the right places (such as documents) the rest is relatively simple.

 

          Let's take an OWL story that you will never see in the OWL-- because it is completely made up-- and see how it gets to the page.

 

          At a staff meeting a reporter/writer says she heard that one of the classrooms in Bladen Hall was being converted for use as a computer lab, but the amount of asbestos in the ceiling was slowing down the job. Everyone at the meeting immediately reacts: is the asbestos dangerous? If it is, do students in the next rooms know they are at risk? The editor gives the writer the story assignment and after the meeting the editor and writer come up with a list of questions.

 

1. Is the room really being converted as a computer lab? When did the job start? How much will it cost?

2. Is it necessary to tear out the ceiling to do this?

3. Is the asbestos dangerous?

4. Is the overall job getting behind schedule because of the asbestos cleanup? Has it added to the cost of the project?

5. What are the methods of "safe cleanup" for old construction asbestos and are they being used? When did they start?

 

6. Did the administration know that the asbestos would require cleanup or was this a surprise?

7. Are any students in other parts of Bladen Hall in any danger and why have they not been notified that there is an asbestos cleanup going on?

8. When do you think the job will now be finished? How far behind schedule would that be?

 

          The writer interviews the vice president for finance and administration and gets these answers: The room will be a computer lab, mostly for general use like the 3rd floor of Ackokeek Hall. The original job was budgeted for $180,000 and began in October 1993, and the ceiling began to come down soon after that date, with the purpose of upgrading the wiring for the significant drain of computers. The administration, he says, was surprised at the asbestos insulation in the ceiling because Bladen Hall was not supposed to have any asbestos in it.  The asbestos cleanup began in December and is still under way. The asbestos cleanup is going to add about $35,000 to the cost of the project, which was supposed to be finished in time for summer session but will now not be ready until the fall semester. Students are not at risk unless they enter that room and the room is kept locked, including during cleanup efforts.

          The writer's first draft of the story looks like this:

 

Vice President for Finance and Administration  Jones says asbestos is not a danger to students in Bladen. The Room 1456 problem will be solved by the end of summer at a cost of $180,000 and computers will be available to all as in Ackokeek.

          For another $3500 PGCC will cover up for its surprise about the asbestos in the ceiling of 1456, where the doors are kept locked for safety since December. Electrical power in the ceiling will be pre pared for the new computers.

          The editor reads the story, and has some recommendations and some more questions.

1. If the administration was surprised to find asbestos in the ceiling, does that mean it wasn't supposed to be there in the first place? When was it built? Who is to blame? Is "cover up" the right phrase for this story?

2. If the room is not ready for summer, will that affect any scheduled classes?

3. Has the administration found asbestos in any other rooms in Bladen? Is that a danger?

4. Why do computers take so much extra electric capacity? They don't seem to draw that much current?

 

 

          The writer's final draft, written after several more calls back to the vice president, and several more preliminary drafts, is much different.

 

          The College plans to sue the original contractors for Bladen Hall because asbestos has been discovered in the ceilings of at least three classrooms in PGCC's oldest (1974) classroom building.

          Students are not in danger, said administrator Jonesy J. Jones, because the asbestos is not being "disturbed" in any classroom except 1456, which is closed for renovations.

          The room was being converted to computer lab space in a project that began in October 1993, but asbestos was discovered in December as the ceiling was removed to upgrade the wiring. An asbestos removal operation was begun in January by Fiber-Gone Contractors, Inc., adding $35,000 to the $180,000 budgeted for the conversion.

          Jones, who is vice president for finance and administration, said that PGCC counsel was putting together a legal action against Biff Batt Builders, the contractor for the original building, because the contract specifications forbid the use of asbestos for insulation even in 1974.

          Though the company has gone through bankruptcy two times since the construction, Jones said, the College hopes to establish grounds for recovering at least the cost of asbestos removal whereever the company installed it.

          A spokeswoman for Biff Batt Builders would not comment on the allegations, saying the company's attorneys had told her nothing could be said until a court date was set.

          Two summer session classes in Computer Assisted Instruction will be cancelled because the computer lab, expected to be in operation by June, will now not open until the fall semester.

          The two rooms on either side of Bladen 1456-- 1454 and 1458-- also have asbestos in their ceilings, said Jones, who is vice president for finance and administration. But he said no students attending classes in those rooms are in danger of exposure because the asbestos is not being disturbed.

          Eventually all three rooms will be part of a larger computer lab complex. Jones said the asbestos will be removed this summer in a separate operation, while they are not being used as classrooms.

          The writer and editor have worked together to produce a story that appears to be accurate, complete and fair and contains information that is of interest to most of the students, faculty and staff of the College. The information is organized in a way that gets the most important points across first. Then the supporting information is arranged in an orderly way so that the story makes sense.

 

          One of the jobs of an editor is to be the representative of the reader, and try to ask questions that readers would want answered while the story is being developed so that the reader will be satisfied after reading the story as it appears in print. Newspapers are periodicals, and there is always a "next issue" in which information that got left out of a story can be added. But if the reporter tries to think like the reader-- "what would I want to know about this topic?"-- and the editor backs the reporter up by asking the same questions, then the next issue can be saved for new stories instead of rehashing old ones.

NOTE some specific things about the story that were improved by the time it got into print:

          *The original first paragraph took it for granted the reader knew about the asbestos and the "Room 1456 Problem". Most readers would have shaken their heads and gone on to something else-- probably not the OWL.

          *The first paragraph referred to Jones, not Jonesy J. Jones. News style requires a full name on "first reference" (the first appearance of the name in print), and Jones thereafter. And Jones is moved down in the story, because he is the source of the material but he is not the story-- the asbestos, the room, the botched contract and the lawsuit are.

          *The cost factors are described completely-- and accurately-- in the finished story. Money is always important. If the College loses the suit and has to lay out $105,000 (3 x $35,000) or more unexpectedly to make Bladen Hall environmentally safe, the money has to come from somewhere.

          *The story has been made more accurate and clearer-- the cleanup costs $35,000 (not $3,500, not $180,000), and fairer (it does not use the hot-button word "cover up", which would probably give everyone in Kent Hall fits). The OWL mission may include giving fits to persons in Kent Hall, but not because of inaccurate facts or poorly chosen words.

 

ASKING QUESTIONS FOR ACCURACY

          As you can see from the previous example, revising a news story from beginning information to final version involves the careful asking of questions. The reporter's job is to determine what questions need to be answered and who can answer them correctly or authoritatively. Correct answers to questions come from people whose business it is to know about the subject. For that reason, some good answers on asbestos removal might come from someone in the maintenance department at PGCC. Authoritative answers (which may or may not be correct) will come from officials who are in charge of the subject.

 

          It is always important to get the official word on any subject from those college officials whose jobs include being the ones who give "the official word". Their jobs include making the college and their fellow officials look good, so you may not get the full truth. No matter. The official word should be sought, plus any other information that helps provide the most correct information possible to the reader.

 

          If the correct information and the official word do not exactly agree, it is not the reporter's job to choose between one or the other-- at least not in a news story. If there is something to be said about this contradiction, it should be said in a commentary, and the reporter might ask the editor if she or he can do one on the subject.

 

          To summarize: a story is a series of answers to questions. The reporter and editor will shape the story by determining what questions a reader would have about the subject and then doing their best to get those answers. The reporter will question a variety of people who know about the subject or who should have a say about it because of their positions of responsibility.

 

          You can't go wrong if you allow PGCC officials their say on a subject, even if the story winds up making them look less than perfect. Don't forget that the OWL will probably have to continue dealing with this official long after you have left the campus. Be persistent but respectful. Don't burn bridges for other reporters who come after you.

 

WRITING CLEARLY

          Although newspaper style appears very different from that you use in composition courses, it is actually not so different. The lede paragraph of a hard news story may contain more details than you are used to including in the introduction to an essay, crammed into less space and fewer sentences. But once the lede is written, news style is rather like explanatory and descriptive essay-writing. The writer of a news story-- which is shorter than the average essay, ordinarily-- tries more frequently to remind the reader what the story is basically all about, by referring back to the theme or "main idea" frequently as she or he adds details and specifics.

 

LAYOUT STYLES

          The current layout style at the OWL is strongly related to the capabilities of desktop publishing. Because the publishing system can provide rectangular, multi-column blocks of type, the OWL uses what is called the "modular" style. Each story element on a page is laid as as much as possible as a rectangle. Rules and screens are used to tie together the different parts of a story (such as main story and "sidebar", or story and art work.

          The OWL frequently uses strongly marked page headings-- currently, reverse strips (black with white letters) with such headings as "news", "opinion," "sports" and so forth reversed in.

          Headline styles are "upstyle" or "downstyle". This is a leadership style point decision. "Upstyle" means that every word is capitalized ("up") except for prepositions and definite articles of four or fewer words. The first letter of each deck (line) is capitalized. "Downstyle" means that only the first letter of each deck (line) of type in the headline is capitalized, except for proper names that would be capitalized in a normal sentence.

 

Upstyle:

President Is Asked for Records

On the Way He Uses College Funds

 

Downstyle:

President is asked for records

on the way he uses College funds.

 

Expanded quotes:

When some art work is needed for relief of a too-gray page, a few words or a long sentence can be copied from the story and set in larger type, to be boxed, bordered or screened and placed in the midst of the column of type.

 

RESOURCES:

Three respected experts on newspaper layout: Edmund G. Arnold (Designing the Total Newspaper); Daryl Moen (Modern Newspaper Design) or Mario Garcia of the American Press Institute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OWLSTYLE: A STYLE BOOK

FOR THE STUDENT NEWSPAPER

AT PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE

          The following is material that deals specifically with Prince George's Community College, its places and people. For all other questions of newspaper style, consult the Associated Press Style Book. Some of the style provisions in this manual can go either way; for instance, some newspapers use "courtesy titles" like Mr. and Ms. and others do not. These are decision points for the editors.

 

 

LEDE PARAGRAPHS contain the 5 W's-- Who, What, When, Where and Why.

Who is most important if the person did something: got an award, got arrested, scored the winning basket, died.

What is most important if it is exciting and/or unusual: Dean wins national award, dean bites dog (which dean? to be named later).

When is generally more important the more recently it happened, or if it establishes some other what as in "what did the president know and when did he know it?"

Where is low-priority for the OWL because it is always assumed that it is at PGCC. If it is the "where" that makes the story unusual, then it becomes more important: instructor drinks beer in classroom.

Why is the question that doesn't usually get answered until the story is finished, though it may be answered in the lede if it is (apparently) simple: semester extended because of icy February weather. But it could turn out to be not that simple: was semester extended because College has vague policy for weather closings?

 

FIRST REFERENCE: means the first time in the story that a proper name (person, place or thing) is used. For people, make sure their first names including middle initial are given completely the first time they appear in the story. If they have a title or job, or something else about them is relevant to the story, try to add that at the same time or as soon as possible if the full reference would make the sentence too long and clumsy.

 

Largo High students on campus are not a problem, according to Jonesy J. Jones, Prince George's Community College vice president for campus security.

 

BUT

Administrator Jonesy J. Jones said that the College would sue a construction company for poor work resulting in asbestos pollution in Bladen Hall.

Jones, who is PGCC vice president for campus security, added  that.....

 

FIRST REFERENCE for places or things, as complete a description as is necessary for understanding.

The English Department at the College plans a new course, Written Correspondence, to be available as soon as Fall 1995.

NOT:  The English Department of the Division of Arts and Humanities at the College plans a new course...

BUT: The English department has petitioned Dean Robert Barshay of the Division of Arts and Humanities for permission to start a new course....

          NOTE: the entries in this section assume that OWLstyle is that the newspaper always refers to Prince George's Community College as "the College," on the premise that it is unmistakably what the PGCC OWL would call it. This would apply on first or any other reference and is a style adopted by some college newspapers but not others. It is one of those "style decisions" that leadership should make.

 

SECOND REFERENCE:

1. courtesy titles

The OWL's current style is not to use "courtesy titles", so all persons are referred to by last names on second reference unless it would be confusing. Jones J. Jones becomes Jones, as does Josephine J. Jones. But if Jonesy and Josephine are in the same story, they retain their first and second names throughout the story. If courtesy titles were used, Jonesy would be Mr. Jones; Josephine would be Mrs. or Ms. Jones (see below).

          The decision on whether or not to use courtesy titles is one that could and probably should be consciously made by the leadership directorate at the beginning of every academic year-- and stuck to. If the decision to use courtesy titles is made, a subdecision is whether to refer to all women as Ms. or to use the courtesy title Ms. or Mrs. depending on the woman's marital status, or to use Mrs. or Ms. (or even Miss) according to the preference of the person referred to. The last choice means reporters had always better remember to ask.

2. Abbreviations

*Prince George's Community College -- PGCC on second and subsequent reference is acceptable.

 

*All courses in the catalogue if referred to by number (for instance, "EGL 102b" but "an upper-level English course."

 

Do not abbreviate names of buildings, departments or divisions of the College unless (in the case of buildings) they are in a list rather than sentence form.

 

COLLEGE REFERENCES: The best sources for style in college references are the current PGCC campus telephone directory and the current Student Handbook. When they differ on the names and titles of campus faculty and staff, rely on the telephone directory and call the person for confirmation.