and a
World
of
Wonder
An NEH-funded seminar series for 2002 bringing scholars of Aristotelian thought to the Prince George's Community College campus
Invited Speakers
Click on each name for more information on each speaker's topic
Thomas Farrell, Northwestern University
Alfonso Gomez-Lobo, Georgetown University
James Lennox, University of Pittsburgh
Alasdair MacIntyre, University of Notre Dame
Gregory Nagy, Harvard University
Katharine Park, Harvard University
Nancy Sherman, Georgetown University
![]()
Information for PGCC Faculty
Congratulations to the twelve faculty participants chosen to participate in Aristotle and a World of Wonder:
Ana I. Echavarri-Dailey, Language Studies
Melinda Frederick, Political Science and The Honors Program
Esther Robbins, Language Studies
Geraldine Shelton, Language Studies
Click here to read the memo of September 24 regarding Aristotle and a World of Wonder
Click here to read a recommendation from Alicia Juarrero on the order in which to read Aristotle's works
Click here to read the narrative of the NEH grant proposal (Please note that since submitting this, dates for some lectures have changed!!)
Click here to see the application to participate in Aristotle and a World of Wonder (deadline has passed)
![]()
For more information on Aristotle and a World of Wonder, contact:
Isa Engleberg (Speech Communication and Theatre) Project Administrator
Alicia Juarrero (Philosophy), Project Co-Director
Christopher Hunt (Physical Sciences), Project Co- Director
![]()
Abstracts
Alfonso Gomez-Lobo, Georgetown University (February 22, 2002)
Dr. Gomez-Lobo facilitated a discussion of questions such as: Why does Aristotle refer to general ontology and theology as first philosophy? What are Aristotle’s views on cause and explanation? What are Aristotle’s conceptions of the academic disciplines?
Back to Top
Nancy Sherman, Georgetown University (April 12, 2002)
Dr. Sherman facilitated a discussion of questions such as: How does Aristotle’s ethics fill out the landscape missing in utilitarianism and Kantian ethics? Does Aristotle teach us how to teach character? What does luck have to do with virtue? What is the relationship between morality and the emotions?
Click here to read a bio of Dr. Sherman
Back to Top
Alasdair MacIntyre, University of Notre Dame (May 3, 2002)
Dr. MacIntyre facilitated a discussion of questions such as: What is the relationship between politics, philosophy, and the common good? Is the nature of a diverse, heterogeneous society likes ours such that it is no longer possible to appeal to moral criteria in a way that had been possible in other times and places? In particular, is the ethos of "the distinctively modern and modernized world" unsatisfactory when confronted by the variety of moral beliefs and practices that characterize a multicultural society?
Supplemental readings for this talk included:
Cooper, John. "Political Animals and Civic Friendship" in his collected essays entitled Reason and Emotion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999).
Depew, David. "Politics, Music and Contemplation in Aristotle's Ideal State," in A Companion to Aristotle's Politics, D. Keyt and F.D. Miller, Jr., eds., (Blackwell, Oxford, 1991).
Click here to see Dr. MacIntyre's faculty page at Notre Dame
Back to Top
Katharine Park, Harvard University (August 20, 2002)
Dr. Park spoke on the Aristotelian Tradition in the Middle Ages, specifically vis-a-vis the work of Nicole Oresme relating to wonder.
Supplemental readings for this talk included:
Oresme, Nicole. "De causis mirabilium," in Nicole Oresme and the Marvels of Nature: A Study of His De causis mirabilium with Critical Edition, Translation, and Commentary, Bert Hansen, editor. (Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies), Prologue and Chapter Three.
Daston, Lorraine and Katharine Park. Wonders and the Order of Nature 1150-1750 (Zone Books, New York, 1998). Chapters One and Three.
Click here to see Dr. Park's web page at Harvard
Back to Top
Thomas B. Farrell, Northwestern University (September 27, 2002)
Dr. Farrell will discuss the Rhetoric, an often unappreciated and misunderstood work, which remains useful to this day. Its tenets have been adopted and adapted by contemporary scholars such as Stephen Toulmin in his nature of argument and Kenneth Burke in his dramatistic theory of rhetoric, as well as psychologists investigating the nature of persuasion. Comparing Aristotle’s treatment of rhetoric and the moral principles in his Nicomachean Ethics will add value to the study of both works. Aristotle noted that "Rightfully employed, [rhetorical devices] work the greatest blessings; and wrongly employed, they work the greatest harm." In a world in which political campaigning, product advertising, image building, and religious proselytizing compete for our attention, the more we know about the strategies and consequences of rhetoric, the more discriminating we can be as readers and listeners.
Click here to read a short bio of Dr. Farrell on Northwestern's page (scroll down on the page to find his name).
Back to Top
James Lennox, University of Pittsburgh (October 25, 2002)
Dr. Lennox's talk, broadly, will deal with and show in concrete detail what Aristotle means when he says, in Parts of Animals I.5, that "We must avoid a childish distaste for examining the less valued animals. For in all natural things there is something wonderful" and "Even in the study of animals unattractive to the senses, the nature that fashioned them offers immeasurable pleasures to those who can learn the causes and are naturally lovers of wisdom." This is poetry, certainly, but a detailed study of his zoology shows that he MEANS it.
Click here to read Dr. Lennox's bio on the History and Philosophy of Science Faculty Page at Pitt
Back to Top
Gregory Nagy, Harvard University (November 15, 2002)
Dr. Nagy, director of Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies, will facilitate a discussion of questions such as: Why did Aristotle’s Poetics gain an extraordinary hold over our modern standards for dramatic literature? Why does Aristotle focus his discussion of poetics on the notion of "imitation" or mimesis? How can we interpret Aristotle’s definition of tragedy, his account of the "tragic hero," and his theory of the "unity" of tragedy?
Click here to see Dr. Nagy's page at Harvard
Back to Top
![]()